Jacob's Golden Update: Election Edition
October 19, 2022
Hi Golden (and beyond) friends and neighbors – it's that time again. Ballots dropped Monday and should start showing up in mailboxes any day (mine arrived yesterday). Every election cycle I share my thoughts and voting recommendations. I hope you find them useful, and whether you agree with them or not please be sure to vote.
How to Vote
If you are new to Golden and haven't registered yet, you still can do so online until October 31, either online, via mail (must be postmarked by 10/31), or in person at a voting center (which you can do all the way through election day).
If you haven't received your ballot by around October 24, contact the Jeffco Elections team, or just go to any In-Person Voter Service and Polling Center (which open on 10/24).
You can vote by mailing your ballot no later than October 31 or by delivering it to one of the 24-hour ballot drop boxes no later than 7 pm on November 8.
If you need any other info check out Jeffco's Election Information webpage.
For most Golden folks, the best In-Person Voting Service and Polling Centers will probably be Golden City Hall (911 10th St) or Jeffco Elections Division (3500 Illinois St, Suite 1100).
For most Golden folks, the best ballot drop boxes will probably be School of Mines (1400 Illinois St), City Hall (911 10th St), the Jeffco Courts and Admin Building (northeast side, 100 Jefferson County Pkwy), or Jeffco Elections Division (3500 Illinois St).
*****
Candidates
7th Congressional District: Brittany Pettersen
I’ve known Brittany for a long time and have the deepest respect for her work ethic, intelligence, and thoughtfulness. She has been a powerhouse at the State Legislature (where she currently serves as a State Senator) and I think will be an exceptional Congressional Representative for Golden.
Jefferson County Commission: Lesley Dahlkemper
There are a bunch of good reasons to support Lesley in her reelection campaign. I’ve appreciated working with her on issues like wildland fire mitigation, and she’s been part of an overall shift at the county in a direction that aligns much better with Golden’s vision and values. It’s also worth mentioning that her opponent was a particularly enthusiastic partisan of the plan to build a high-speed superhighway through Golden.
Jefferson County Clerk: Amanda Gonzalez
I've been deeply impressed with George Stern's work as our County Clerk these past four years, improving how vehicle registration and other parts of the office is run, making it more convenient to vote, and making it easier to get the information you need about the officer and its services. I meet Amanda earlier this year and am very impressed, and think she will pick up where George is leaving off.
Colorado State House District 27: Brianna Titone
Because of redistricting, Rep. Titone is new to Golden but she’s not new to the Legislature. I’ve had the opportunity to work with her these past couple of years on a number of bills. She’s smart, earnest, and takes seriously her commitment to listen to the range of perspective and then make what she feels is the most reasonable decision. I think she’ll be a strong, pragmatic voice for Golden.
U.S. Senate: Michael Bennet
I’m not sure what image the title “U.S. Senator” conjures for most people, but I am pretty sure Michael isn’t it. He’s not showy or flashy, he’s not spotlight-hungry, and he tends to avoid the partisan rancor. He’s also one of the smarter and more thoughtful Senators, with clear values pragmatically applied. In my view he is doing a great job and I will be voting for him.
State Treasurer: Dave Young
This is one of those seats where I mostly just want someone who understands the role and is competent at performing. Everything I know about Dave Young, the current Treasurer, aligns with that.
In the interests of time and getting this email sent now that the ballots are out, I’ll just say about the following folks that I’ve worked with all of them, and while I don’t always agree with all of their views I do find that they generally align with my values and are doing a good job in their respective roles.
Governor: Jared Polis
Lt. Governor: Diana Primavera
Attorney General: Phil Weiser
Secretary of State: Jena Griswold
Colorado State Senate District 22: Jessie Danielson
*****
Ballot Measures
Amendment D: Yes
The Legislature created a new judicial district by splitting an existing one in half. This would allow judges to be assigned to the new district. I don’t know of any downside.
Amendment E: Yes
Currently, disabled veterans benefit from a property tax exemption. This would extend the benefit to surviving spouses of these veterans after they die.
Amendment F: TBD
This measure would change state rules on bingo games and raffles to make it easier for nonprofits to use these for fundraising. I don’t love expanding gambling but do love supporting nonprofits. I haven’t decided yet how I’ll vote.
Proposition FF: Yes
This substantially expands healthy food programs in schools, helping to ensure that all kids can get healthy school meals regardless of family income, which I strongly support. The funding comes from capping state income tax deductions for households making more than $300,000 a year.
Proposition GG: Yes
For future ballot measures that change the state income tax rate, this would require including a table showing how the measure would impact voters.
Proposition 121: No
This would reduce Colorado's relatively low state income tax rate from 4.55% to 4.4%. Most of the benefit would go to the wealthiest Coloradans (as I understand it, three-quarters of Colorado taxpayers would receive a tax cut of less than $63 per year, while those with incomes above $1 million will see a reduction of $6,647). We are often frustrated by Colorado’s poor performance on funding for schools, higher education, health care, and other priorities. This measure would further hurt the state’s ability to fund all of these things.
Proposition 122: Yes
This would allow for the medical use of natural psychedelic substances (such as psychedelic mushrooms) and would decriminalize simple possession. I think it’s always worth asking hard questions about measures like this, but – as with marijuana – this seems to pass the test. As with medical marijuana, the research shows that these substances can have real therapeutic value for people experiencing PTSD, depression, and other mental health challenges.
Proposition 123: Yes
This one is complicated. Simply put, in TABOR surplus years, this measure would reduce the amount of TABOR refunds sent to Colorado taxpayers and use those dollars to fund affordable housing programs. In non-surplus years, this measure would mean that affordable housing programs get an automatic portion of the state’s discretionary spending, likely reducing the amount available for other critical priorities like transportation, education, and public health. I’ve struggled on this one. Affordable housing really is a serious problem all over Colorado (this isn’t a problem the market is solving on its own), and it hits low-income folks the hardest. I’m very reluctant to build more fixed funding formulas into the Constitution that even further hamper the state government’s ability to respond to changing circumstances. My understanding, further, is that the structure of measure will make it very difficult for smaller communities to access these funds. I don’t love it. But this is a statutory rather than Constitutional measure, however, which means the Legislature could change it if they feel necessary, so it would establish affordable housing as a serious statewide priority while still preserving the Legislature’s ability to make changes. It’s not ideal, in my view, but it’s valuable enough to support.
Proposition 124: No
This would allow liquor store chains to expand their number of locations. The measure is heavily funded – surprise – by a massive out-of-state liquor store chain. This would almost certainly harm locally owned businesses in Colorado. As State Representative Chris Kennedy put it, I'd prefer to stand with small breweries and retailers over large ones.
Proposition 125: No
This would allow grocery and convenience stores to sell wine (in addition to full-strength beer, which they can sell currently). As with Proposition 124, this would likely benefit big supermarket and convenience store chains at the expense of locally owned businesses.
Proposition 126: No
Currently, alcohol delivery is allowed when it’s done by a store employee, which helps ensure that alcohol is not delivered to underage drinkers. This measure would third party vendors to deliver alcohol. I like the idea of making it easier for smaller restaurants to more readily compete on food delivery, which this would probably do. But it bypasses most of the systems now in place to prevent kids from buying alcohol (point of purchase controls, training on recognizing fake IDs, liquor license penalties, etc.). It’s hard to see how this wouldn’t simply result in more kids accessing more alcohol. As with medical marijuana and psychedelic mushrooms, the right balance to my mind makes it easy for adults to make their own choices while having a strong system in place to prevent kids from accessing those substances.
Jeffco Issue 1A: Yes
This would mean that when Jefferson County gets grants from the state, it won’t force the county to just issue more in TABOR refunds (completely undermining the value of getting state grant funding).
Jeffco Issue 1B and 1C: Yes
These measures would allow for marijuana sales and manufacturing in unincorporated Jefferson County.
**********
Feel free to share this email with anyone you think might find it useful and reach out anytime with suggestions, questions, or other thoughts.